Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Nunez and colleagues (2019) question whether cognitive science still exists "as a coherent academic field with a well-defined and cohesive interdisciplinary research program." This worry may be premature on two grounds. First, we are not convinced that the Lakatosian criterion of coalescence around a core framework is the best standard for judging whether a field is well-defined and productive. Second, although we acknowledge that cognitive science is not as visible as we would like, we doubt that this low profile accurately reflects the state of actual research and teaching programs based on the cognitive science approach. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1111/tops.12466 | TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Cognitive science,Multidisciplinary,Interdisciplinary,Lakatos | Multidisciplinary approach,Cognitive science,Psychology,Psychotherapist | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
11.0 | SP4.0 | 1756-8757 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gwen J. Broude | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Kenneth R. Livingston | 2 | 17 | 6.86 |
| Joshua de Leeuw | 3 | 1 | 1.64 |
| Janet K. Andrews | 4 | 1 | 1.07 |
| john h long | 5 | 10 | 3.60 |